Last week, Michael Gove made headlines when he said that the Good Friday Agreement was a «historic achievement» but that it was time to «update» it. These comments have caused a lot of controversy, with many people questioning what exactly Gove means by «updating» the agreement and whether it could potentially unravel the peace process.

First, a quick refresher on what the Good Friday Agreement is. The agreement, signed in 1998, brought an end to the decades-long conflict in Northern Ireland known as «the Troubles.» It established a power-sharing government in Northern Ireland, recognized the right of the people of Northern Ireland to identify as Irish, British, or both, and created new policing and justice structures.

It`s worth noting that the Good Friday Agreement is a complex document that was the result of years of negotiation and compromise. It`s not something that can be changed lightly or without careful consideration of the consequences.

So, what did Michael Gove mean when he said that it was time to «update» the agreement? In an interview with BBC Radio 4, Gove said that the protocol on Northern Ireland in the Brexit deal needed to be amended in order to «ensure the peace process is sustained.» He also said that there were «bugs» in the Good Friday Agreement that needed to be fixed.

These comments have been met with skepticism from many quarters. Some have accused Gove of using the language of peace to push a political agenda, while others have argued that the Good Friday Agreement is not something that can be tinkered with without risking a return to violence.

It`s also worth noting that the protocol on Northern Ireland in the Brexit deal is itself a contentious issue. The protocol aims to prevent a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland by keeping Northern Ireland aligned with the EU`s single market for goods. However, unionist politicians in Northern Ireland have opposed the protocol, arguing that it undermines Northern Ireland`s place in the UK.

So, where does this leave us? It`s clear that the Good Friday Agreement is a sensitive issue that requires careful handling. If Michael Gove really does want to update the agreement, he will need to do so in a way that takes account of the complex history and politics of Northern Ireland. Any changes to the agreement should be made in consultation with all of the parties involved, and with the aim of strengthening rather than undermining the peace process.

In the meantime, it`s important to remember that the Good Friday Agreement remains one of the most important achievements of the peace process in Northern Ireland. It has brought an end to decades of violence and created a foundation for a more peaceful and prosperous future. Any attempts to change it should be approached with caution and with the utmost respect for the delicate balance of interests and relationships that it represents.